Preserving the historical buildings: A priority

It is important to preserve the beautiful buildings of the past, even if it will be expensive to do so. To what extent do you agree or disagree with it.

It is an irrefutable fact that beautiful buildings of the past, in this contemporary world, are an integral part of a nation’s culture and heritage. Considering this, there are some analysts who insist that it is imperative to preserve these ancient buildings, even if it is a costly activity. I staunchly agree with the above-mentioned proposal due to a notable reason.

There is a practical factor which affirms that these buildings with historical significance should be preserved irrespective of the costs involved. Being a marker of our culture and heritage could be a substantial factor. It is generally seen that these ancient structures are not only a sign of our rich culture, but also an important heritage for our future generations. Therefore, we are duty-bound to preserve them. For example, a recent article in The Age revealed that 80% of the historians in Australia agree with the aforementioned viewpoint.

Despite the reason discussed above, there are some opponents who endorse the view that preserving the ancient buildings is quite expensive. Prioritizing the funds for other sectors could be a single most reason behind opponent’s viewpoint. It is commonly seen that these funds can be used to improve the health and education sectors rather than historical buildings. No doubt, the better usage of the money can be true to a certain extent; however, it should also not to be forgotten that preserving the heritage buildings is paramount for any civilization. If this is the case, would it be wise to oppose this noble idea? My answer would be no.

In the end, indeed, preserving the ancient buildings is expensive may be true, but I still believe that we should preserve these buildings even if it involves higher costs.

Climate Change: Who is responsible?

Climate change is a concerning global issue. Who should take the responsibilities, governments, big companies or individuals?

It is an irrefutable fact that climate change, in this contemporary world, has become a concerning global issue. Considering this, whether governments, big companies or individuals should be responsible for this global issue is a matter of debate. However, before deducing a reasonable conclusion, this essay will examine both sides of the argument.

There is a variety of factors wherein the opinion that government should be more accountable for the global issue of climate change could be reinforced. Initially, having the authority to implement the laws is a pivotal aspect to be considered. It is generally seen that the governments not only have the supremacy but also have the resources to device the effective laws which can curb the industries and individuals from exacerbating the environmental issues. For example, a recent article in The Age revealed that 80% of the environmentalists agree with the aforementioned argument. Secondly, having the ability to levy taxes and subsidies could be another noteworthy factor to consider.

Despite the factors discussed above regarding the role of government, big companies and individual also have a part to play for climate change is even a crucial aspect. First and foremost, monitoring the carbon emissions as per the guidelines could be a substantial factor to be taken into account. It is commonly seen that by adhering to the rules and regulations, these industries can play an instrumental role in controlling the greenhouse gas emission, which will mitigate the impacts of climate change. In addition, becoming responsible citizens could another noteworthy factor for the individuals.

In the end, indeed, big companies and individuals should take some responsibility for this issue may be true; however, as far as I am concerned, government should be more accountable for climate change.

Late assignments: Should the marks be deducted?

Some universities deduct students’ marks if assignment is given late. What is your opinion and suggest some alternative actions?

It is an irrefutable fact that assessments and assignments, in this contemporary world, are an integral part of a student’s life. Considering this, whether universities should deduct student’s marks if the submission is delayed, or there could be other alternative ways is a matter of discussion. However, before deducing a reasonable conclusion, this essay will examine both sides of the argument.

There is a variety of factors wherein the opinion that students should be penalised for their work if the assignments are given late could be supported. Initially, being fair for everyone could be a substantial factor to be considered. It is generally believed that if there are no punitive measures taken against the late submission of assignments, it would be not only biased but also discriminatory for those who submit the assessment tasks on time. For example, a recent article published in The Age revealed that 80% of teachers in Victorian TAFEs agree with the aforementioned notion. In addition, upholding the principles of discipline and success may be another supporting factor to consider.

Despite the factors discussed above regarding the marks’ deduction for late submissions, adopting some alternative methods is even a crucial aspect. Guiding the students regularly for timely submission could be a significant factor. It is commonly seen that not only should the teachers mentor and remind the students for timely submission, but there should also be special provision for the weaker students. Besides, having special consideration for some students on compassionate grounds could be another noteworthy factor.

In the end, indeed, alternative ways to help students submit the work on time may be true up to a certain extent; however, as far as I am concerned, universities should deduct students’ marks if the assignment is given late.

Cashless society: Is it a reality or not?

In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. Cashless society seems to be a reality. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon?

It is an irrefutable fact that the move towards creating a cashless society, in this contemporary world, seems to have become the reality of consumers’ lives. Considering this, this essay will ascertain the pros and cons of using credit cards for all our economic activities before suggesting a conclusion.

There are numerous advantages of using the plastic money for all our transactions. First and foremost, being convenient for shopping could be a substantial benefit to be considered. It is generally believed that making the purchases by using credit cards or debit cards is not only quicker for the consumers, but also time saving because they do not have to travel to different places. A recent article published in The Age revealed that 80% of the consumers agreed with the aforementioned benefit, which could be taken as an espousing example to substantiate this advantage. Moreover, curbing the incidents of robbery or theft associated with physical money could be another noteworthy advantage to take into account.

Despite the advantages discussed above regarding the usage of credit card, there is a disadvantage as well, which should not be neglected without careful consideration. Lack of technological awareness could be the single most detrimental impact of this trend. It may be defined as senior citizens are not comfortable with the technology of using a credit card; therefore, they will face lot of issues if it used wrongly.

In the end, in spite of having lost of advantages of the phenomenon of cashless society, the negative aspect of this trend needs careful consideration.

The world’s governments and organizations are facing a lot of issues. Which do you think is the most pressing problem for the inhabitants on our planet? And give solutions

The world’s governments and organizations are facing a lot of issues. Which do you think is the most pressing problem for the inhabitants on our planet? And give solutions

It is an irrefutable fact that climate change, in this contemporary world, has become one of the most pressing problems for governments and organisations globally. Considering this, this essay will discuss the reasons why climate change is the most problematic issue before suggesting some plausible solutions.

There are numerous reasons why climate change should be the paramount concern of the governments and organisations around the world. Firstly, melting polar ice and rising water levels could be important reasons to be considered. It is generally observed that rising sea levels has put many important cities around the world at stake, which will lead to not only dangerous situation to millions of population inhabiting these cities but also difficult situation for the economies of the world. For example, a recent article in The Age revealed that the cities of London, New York, Mumbai, Shanghai and Sydney will be submerged if the rate of melting of ice is not tackled.

Despite the reasons discussed above regarding the dangers of climate change, there are some solutions that can be implemented to mitigate the impacts of climate change. First and foremost, planting more plants and trees could be an effective solution to be taken into account. It is commonly seen that increased afforestation campaigns will result in improving the climate and soil conditions; therefore, this can serve as a positive step for decreasing the damage caused by climate change.

In the end, indeed, it is truism that climate change is a very concerning issue around the globe; however, above mentioned solution can be implemented to alleviate the possible harmful effects.

It is common that most people are in poor health. Outline how people can change their lifestyles and how nation can adjust the health care system to tackle this issue.

It is common that most people are in poor health. Outline how people can change their lifestyles and how nation can adjust the health care system to tackle this issue.

It is an irrefutable fact that the increased incidences of poor health, in this contemporary society, have become a common issue for most individuals in the world. Considering this, this essay will outline the lifestyle modifications that could be adopted by individuals before highlighting the amendments to the health care system that governments can device to mitigate this problem.

There are numerous ways in which individuals can alter their lifestyle to improve their health. Firstly, adopting a healthy living could be a significant factor to be considered. It is generally observed that not only regular exercise but also healthy diet could play determining roles in improving people’s health, which is advised to be an integral part of a person’s daily routine. Quitting smoking, less-intake of alcohol and unhealthy foods could be taken as espousing examples to support this viewpoint. Secondly, promoting organic foods could be another substantial factor to be taken into account.

Despite the factor discussed above regarding lifestyle changes, there are certain adjustments that governments can make to the health care system to lessen this problem. Initially, making health care affordable could be a pivotal factor to consider. It is commonly seen that by making the health system accessible to every individual, governments can assist in improving the health of the citizens. Moreover, providing medical insurances could another beneficial factor.

In the end, indeed, it is truism that poor health has become a concerning issue not only for people but also for the governments; however, above mentioned some solutions can be applied to alleviate the harmful effects.

As cities are expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or experience to support.

It is an irrefutable fact that development of infrastructure to complement the expansion of cities, in this contemporary world, has become an integral part of every government’s policies. Considering this, whether governments should invest in creating better and effective public transport networks, or it should build more roads for private vehicles is a matter of discussion. However, before deducing a reasonable conclusion, this essay will present both sides of the argument.

 There is a variety of factors wherein the opinion that governments should prioritise developing an effective networking of public transportation such as trains and buses could be supported. Initially, reducing the carbon emissions could be a substantial reason to be considered. It is generally observed that more use of public transport by the commuters will reduce the number of cars on the roads, which will not only minimise the pollution but also improve the problems of congestion. For example, a recent article in The Age revealed that improved effectiveness of Metro in Melbourne has attributed to 25% reduction in air pollution. In addition, boosting the economy could be another factor to consider.

 Despite the factors discussed above regarding the importance of having better public transport networks, building roads for the private cars is even a crucial aspect. Firstly, improving the connectivity could be a significant factor to be taken into account. It is commonly perceived that travelling by own conveyance is much more convenient and time saving because it can eliminate the waiting times for connecting buses and trains for longer journeys.

 In the end, indeed, building more roads could be true to certain extent; however, as far my opinion is concerned, creating better public transportation networking is more beneficial.