Climate Change: Who is responsible?

Climate change is a concerning global issue. Who should take the responsibilities, governments, big companies or individuals?

It is an irrefutable fact that climate change, in this contemporary world, has become a concerning global issue. Considering this, whether governments, big companies or individuals should be responsible for this global issue is a matter of debate. However, before deducing a reasonable conclusion, this essay will examine both sides of the argument.

There is a variety of factors wherein the opinion that government should be more accountable for the global issue of climate change could be reinforced. Initially, having the authority to implement the laws is a pivotal aspect to be considered. It is generally seen that the governments not only have the supremacy but also have the resources to device the effective laws which can curb the industries and individuals from exacerbating the environmental issues. For example, a recent article in The Age revealed that 80% of the environmentalists agree with the aforementioned argument. Secondly, having the ability to levy taxes and subsidies could be another noteworthy factor to consider.

Despite the factors discussed above regarding the role of government, big companies and individual also have a part to play for climate change is even a crucial aspect. First and foremost, monitoring the carbon emissions as per the guidelines could be a substantial factor to be taken into account. It is commonly seen that by adhering to the rules and regulations, these industries can play an instrumental role in controlling the greenhouse gas emission, which will mitigate the impacts of climate change. In addition, becoming responsible citizens could another noteworthy factor for the individuals.

In the end, indeed, big companies and individuals should take some responsibility for this issue may be true; however, as far as I am concerned, government should be more accountable for climate change.

"In the war of ideas, it is the people who get killed". Does the common man suffers from a group's ideology? Discuss and give your opinion.

It is an irrefutable fact that group ideology or opinion, in this contemporary world, has become an integral part and parcel of our society. Considering this, whether a common man suffers from a group’s ideology or not is a matter of discussion. However, this essay will examine both sides of the argument before deducing a reasonable conclusion.

There are numerous factors wherein the fact that group’s ideology negatively/adversely affects the common people. Firstly, marring/damaging the economy of the nation could be a significant factor to be considered. It is generally seen that in the war of ideas such as wars, the economy slows down, which compromises the basic needs of the common people resulting in their sufferings. For example, a recent article/survey in The Age revealed that 80% of the people agree that group’s ideology affects the commoners by slowing the economy. Additionally, common man faces the actual consequences could be another substantial factor behind this viewpoint.

Despite the above mentioned/aforementioned factors regarding the negative impact of group’s ideology for general people, there are some people who propose that it does not make common man suffer is even a crucial aspect. Long term benefits may be a noteworthy factor to be taken into account. It is commonly believed that sometimes the opposition to a particular ideology is not only better but also compulsory for the generations to come, such as the war of independence for certain countries.

In the end, indeed, group’s ideology does not affect the commoners may be true; however, as far as I am concerned, in most cases, it does have serious implications on the common people’s lives.

Sports and games create disturbance in students’ life because students cannot fully concentrate on their studies. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Irrefutably, sports and games play a pivotal role in a student’s life in addition to education and qualifications. Considering this, there are some analysts who insist that these extra-curricular activities create disturbance in students’ lives by impeding their academic progress. However, I staunchly disagree with the aforementioned rubric.

There is a practical factor which affirms the indispensable role of sports and games in the student life. Enhancing the overall physiological and psychological health could be a significant factor. It is generally seen that involving in physical activities assist the students in developing not only a sound physical but also mental health, which are interdependent for overall growth. For example, a recent article published in The Age revealed that more than 80% of the students participating in sports and games are better performers in life than their peers.

Despite the reason discussed above, there are some groups who consider that extra-curricular activities should be avoided during the student life in order to excel. Distraction is the single most significant factor behind opponent’s viewpoint. They generally believe that students' indulgence in these activities, while studying, proves to distract them, which may play a role of an impediment for their academic success. No doubt, distraction could be true up to a certain extent; however, it should also not to be forgotten that a healthy mind lives in a healthy body. If this is the case, would it be wise enough to discourage the participation of students in sports and games?  My answer would be no.

In the end, indeed, disturbance in academics due to overindulgence in the sports activities may be true to some extent, but I still believe that the merits of sports far outweigh the demerits.

In under developed countries, tourism has disadvantages and can be said the opposite as well.

It is an irrefutable fact that the enhancements in air travel have increased the frequency and affordability of visiting new places around the world. Considering this, this essay will ascertain the merits and demerits associated with the tourism in underdeveloped countries, like Nepal, Thailand, Malaysia etc.

There are numerous advantages of promoting tourism in the third world nations. Firstly, economic benefits for these countries could be a significant benefit to be considered. It is generally seen that the tourist base of these countries is mainly comprised of the people from developed countries, which not only brings the foreign currency but also contributes to the rise in employment opportunities for the educated and uneducated masses of these countries, alike. Reliance of Nepal’s 80 % of the economy on tourism industry could be taken as a fortifying example to substantiate the benefit. Moreover, comparatively low-budgeted tourism to these countries could be another indispensable benefit.

Despite the aforementioned advantages regarding the tourism in underdeveloped countries, there is a disadvantage too, which could not be neglected without a careful consideration. Safety and security of the tourists could a single most detrimental impact. It is generally perceived that the unstable and weaker governmental machinery of these countries is more likely to jeopardize the well-being of the visiting foreign tourists. For instance, recent attacks on foreigners by a group of extremists in Nepal lead to the death of 15 foreign tourists.

In the end, indeed, endorsing the tourism in underdeveloped countries has innumerable benefits for the country; however, the alarming negative impacts of the same should also be taken into consideration.

International travel and tourism makes people prejudiced rather than broad-minded. What are its causes and what measures can be taken to solve this problem?

It is an irrefutable fact that due to an urge to learn new cultures and visit new places, international tourism has increased considerably, which is, among other things, resulting in increased prejudice rather than broad mindedness. Considering this, this essay will ascertain the considerable factors which are playing their predominating role to increase the incidents of being prejudice before outlining appropriate measures to cope.

There are some factors involved in increasing the prejudice against the international tourists during their travel. Firstly, cultural and traditional sentiments could be a significant espousing factor to be considered. It is generally seen that the international tourists, inadvertently, end up hurting the cultural or traditional beliefs of not only certain communities but also some religions, which is not considered appropriate by the natives. Not removing the shoes while visiting the temples or not offering a tip to the waiters could be taken as fortifying examples. Moreover, intense bargaining by a certain community could another substantial cause for this biased behavior.

Despite the causes discussed above regarding the increased prejudice, there are quite a few readily solutions available which could be implemented to mitigate the impacts caused by the potential factors. Initially, awareness could be an effective tool. It can be defined as making ourselves familiar with the cultures and traditions of host countries before our travel by researching on the internet, so our naivety does not become a cause for the misunderstanding. Additionally, having fixed price shops, like big brands, could be another indispensable key.

In the end, indeed, prejudice with the international tourists is adversely affecting the broad-mindedness; however, aforementioned some concrete steps can assist to alleviate the damaging impacts.

The newspaper is no longer a need in the modern society. What is your opinion?

It is an irrefutable fact that newspapers, in this contemporary world, have been an integral part and parcel of our lives for a long time. Considering this, whether newspaper is relevant to this modern society or not is a matter of debate. However, this essay will ascertain both sides of the rubric before deducing a reasonable conclusion.

There is a variety of factors wherein the threat to the existence of newspapers in this tech-savvy society could be supported. Initially, the dominance of electronic media could be a substantial factor to be considered. It is generally seen that the popularity of print media has confronted a severe setback due to the advent of internet, which is more a convenient and cheaper way to access information. For example, a recent article in The Age highlighted/revealed that the use of the popular news apps has increased by 60% in the past two years. Moreover, wastage of resources, like paper and ink, which is not an eco-friendly way, may be another noteworthy factor.

Despite the factors discussed above regarding the diminishing popularity of newspapers, the importance of it in the modern society is even a crucial aspect. Affordability could be a significant factor. It is commonly believed that the newspapers have always been an indispensable part of our lives due to its cheaper prices. Additionally, preference audience for newspapers, such as older population, could be another prominent reason.

In the end, indeed, although newspapers still dominate the proportionate market, as far as I am concerned, the electronic media has made it non-existent in this modern era.

Some people believe laws change human behaviour. Do you agree with it?

Irrefutably, formation and implementation of laws are imperative for providing a congenial environment to the society. Considering this, there are certain analysts who hold the opinion that laws change the behaviour of the humans. However, I staunchly disagree with the aforementioned statement due to a notable reason.

There is a practical factor which affirms that enforcing laws does not play a great deal of role in changing human traits. Rising recidivism rate could be substantial factor. It is generally seen that even after completing the prison term for a crime or undergoing rehabilitation for certain addiction, people go back to the similar old practices. Many hard core criminals and quite a few celebrities could be taken as fortifying examples to substantiate my viewpoint.

Despite the reason discussed above, there are certain proponents who consider that adhering to laws in the society transforms the people. Fear of punishment may be single most significant factor behind opponents’ viewpoint. It may be defined as when one has to face the repercussions in the guise of penalty or imprisonment, people avoid breaking the laws. No doubt, change due to fear could be true to some extent; however, it should not be forgotten that many people have little or no regard for their social and moral responsibilities. If this is the case, would it be wise enough to generalize and say that law changes the behaviour of all the people? My answer would be no.

In the end, indeed, changing behaviour by following law transforms people to some extent, but I still believe that it is hard to change most people completely by making them adhere to laws.

Euthanasia is no longer acceptable in the modern society. Discuss the solutions to accept this fact.

It is an irrefutable fact that in this contemporary world, euthanasia has been a debatable topic for years. Considering this, this essay will ascertain the considerable/prominent factors which are playing predominating role to decrease the acceptance of euthanasia in our society before outlining the appropriate measures to cope with it.

There are some factors involved in increasing the drive against euthanasia. Firstly, being against religious and ethical beliefs could be a significant factor to be considered. It is generally believed that in every religion killing another human being, for whatever reason, is considered unethical and against the will of the Almighty.  A recent article in The Age revealed that more than 80% of the population in modern society considers euthanasia as an evil practice, which could be taken as a fortifying example. In addition to this, fear of denting the conscience and reputation of medical fraternity could be a substantial cause behind increased dislike/antipathy towards euthanasia.

Despite the causes discussed above regarding the nonacceptance of euthanasia in our society, there are quite a few readily solutions exist, which could be implemented to make it an acceptable practice. Initially, legalizing this practice could be an effective tool. It is generally seen that when a practice is legalized by the government agencies, the society, gradually, starts looking at the positives associated with such a rule, which makes them less resilient towards such beliefs. Moreover, respecting the rights and dignity of an ailing patient could be another indispensable key that can be adopted.

In the end, indeed, it is quite a complex process to accept euthanasia; however, aforementioned some concrete steps can assist to mitigate the nonacceptance of it.

Polygamy has increased widely in recent years. What solutions can be brought forward to decrease this issue?

It is an irrefutable fact that in the recent years, the trend of having more than one spouse has been increasing, and thus polygamy is becoming a startling issue. Considering this, this essay will examine the considerable factors which are playing their predominating role to increase the trend of more than one marriage before succinctly deducing appropriate measures to cope with this issue.

There are some factors involved in the upsurge of polygamy these days. First and foremost, cultural beliefs could be a significant factor to be considered. It is quite evident that in some cultures and regions of the society, polygamy is culturally and religiously acceptable practice, and therefore there have been hardly any antagonism to such a practice. A recent survey conducted in the under-developed countries revealed that more than 80% of the population accepts polygamy as an appropriate practice due to their beliefs. Moreover, the probability of having children increases, especially when the first partner is barren could be another significant reason.

Despite the causes discussed above regarding the reasons for increased polygamy, there are quite a few readily available solutions which could be implemented to mitigate/alleviate the impact triggered by the potential factors. Initially, awareness about polygamy could be an effective tool. It is generally seen that when the people are enlightened about the adverse effects of a practice, it works as a deterrent against such a belief. Additionally, awareness regarding the scientific and medical advancements, which assists in befitting medical treatment for infertile individuals, could be another indispensable key that can be adopted.

In the end, undoubtedly, the cases of polygamy are on the upsurge due to numerous factors; however, above mentioned/aforementioned some concrete steps can assist to mitigate/alleviate the damaging impacts.

In education system, assessment through written formal examinations is valid or not.

It is an irrefutable fact that in order to quantify the skills based on the grasped knowledge, assessments play a significant/indispensable role. Considering this, whether written examination is a better medium to assess the skills or not is a matter of discussion. However, before deducing a reasonable conclusion, this essay will examine both sides of the argument.

There is a variety of factors wherein the necessity of having written exams could be supported. Firstly, making students more disciplined could be a substantial factor to be considered. It is generally seen that these examinations are conducted in a very time constraint manner with invigilators around, which does not let students to use the sources for plagiarism. Also, they are assessed on their actual knowledge and understanding without external assistance. IIT, GMAT, AIEEE etc. could be taken as fortifying examples to substantiate the viewpoint. Moreover, refining the basic understanding may be another noteworthy factor.

Despite the factors discussed above regarding the merits of written examination, not being a valid assessment is even a crucial aspect. Inhibiting the cognitive skills could be a prominent factor. It can be seen that written assessments assess the students based on the class knowledge, which may not only deter them from highlighting their actual skills but also impede their ability to think out of the box.

In the end, indeed, the validity of written assessments to assess the skills may be questioned; however, as far as I am concerned, the merit of this examination outweighs the demerits.

Xenophobia has accelerated rapidly in the Western countries. According to you what solutions can be proposed by the government and individuals?

It is an irrefutable fact that in this contemporary world, the rate of xenophobia is accelerating in the western countries, which is becoming a concerning issue for a congenial society. Considering this, this essay will ascertain the considerable factors, which are playing their predominating role to increase xenophobia before outlining appropriate measures to alleviate it.

There are some factors involved in intensification of xenophobia in developed countries. First and foremost, migration from developing and underdeveloped countries could be a significant factor. It is generally seen that most people do not like migrants coming to their countries as they perceive them as a threat to their cultures, race and beliefs. A recent victory of Donald Trump in USA could be taken as a fortifying example to substantiate the aforementioned reason. Moreover, political motives could be another substantial cause behind the rise in abhorrence towards migrants.

Despite the causes discussed above regarding the increasing xenophobia in western countries, there are quite a few readily available solutions that could be implemented to mitigate the impacts instigated by the potential factors. Initially, awareness and acceptance for the migrants could be an effective tool. It can be defined as some programs that could not only educate the society about respect towards every culture but also highlight the benefits associated with migration. Furthermore, punishment by the authorities for any hate speeches and hate promotions could be another indispensable solution that could be adopted.

In the end, undoubtedly, the incidents of xenophobia in the western societies are on the upsurge; however, above mentioned some concrete steps can assist to allay the damaging effects.