As cities are expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or experience to support.

It is an irrefutable fact that development of infrastructure to complement the expansion of cities, in this contemporary world, has become an integral part of every government’s policies. Considering this, whether governments should invest in creating better and effective public transport networks, or it should build more roads for private vehicles is a matter of discussion. However, before deducing a reasonable conclusion, this essay will present both sides of the argument.

 There is a variety of factors wherein the opinion that governments should prioritise developing an effective networking of public transportation such as trains and buses could be supported. Initially, reducing the carbon emissions could be a substantial reason to be considered. It is generally observed that more use of public transport by the commuters will reduce the number of cars on the roads, which will not only minimise the pollution but also improve the problems of congestion. For example, a recent article in The Age revealed that improved effectiveness of Metro in Melbourne has attributed to 25% reduction in air pollution. In addition, boosting the economy could be another factor to consider.

 Despite the factors discussed above regarding the importance of having better public transport networks, building roads for the private cars is even a crucial aspect. Firstly, improving the connectivity could be a significant factor to be taken into account. It is commonly perceived that travelling by own conveyance is much more convenient and time saving because it can eliminate the waiting times for connecting buses and trains for longer journeys.

 In the end, indeed, building more roads could be true to certain extent; however, as far my opinion is concerned, creating better public transportation networking is more beneficial.

With the increased use of internet and digital media, the libraries are becoming obsolete. Universities should therefore only procure digital materials rather than constantly investing in the books. Discuss both the advantages and disadvantages?

It is an irrefutable fact that internet and digital material, in this contemporary society, are becoming an integral part of the educational institutes. Considering this, this essay will discuss the pros and cons associated with only procuring the digital material rather than investing in the books in the universities around the world.

There are a number of benefits of equipping the modern libraries with digital material rather than investing in the paper based books. First and foremost, having lesser burden on the environment could be a substantial advantage to be considered. It is generally believed that the more use of internet and digital books will lead to less demand for printed books; therefore, this will result in less demand for trees and plant resources leading to not only better but also greener environment. A recent article published in The Age revealed that 50% of the deforestation occurs to meet the demands of the paper mills, which could be taken as an espousing example to substantiate this benefit. Besides, having easy accessibility to the resources could be another benefit to be considered.

Despite the positives discussed above regarding the procurement of digital materials rather than books, there is a disadvantage as well, which could not be negated without careful contemplation. Expensive overheads and associated costs could be few detrimental impacts to be taken into account. It is commonly observed that initial costs of setting up digital media in lieu of library could be high because it requires not only a stable internet connection and server but also devices like i-pads and smartphones, which could limit the accessibility.

In the end, indeed, the move of the universities towards digital material to replace the books has many merits; however, the negative aspects also need careful consideration.

What are the advantages and disadvantages if the poorer countries may get a help as international aid from developed countries?

What are the advantages and disadvantages if the poorer countries may get a help as international aid from developed countries?

It is an irrefutable fact that international aid to the developing and underdeveloped nations, in this contemporary society, should be an integral part for the policy makers in the developed countries. Considering this, this essay will ascertain the pros and cons associated with the provision of financial help to these nations.

There are a number of advantages of providing financial aid and support to the poorer nations. First and foremost, providing the basic amenities to people in the under-developed countries could be a substantial benefit to be considered. It is generally believed that these poor nations do not have access to resources to avail the basic needs like food, clothing and shelter to their destitute; therefore, the aid availed by the developed world will assist the governments in fulfilling these basic requirements. Providing better medical facilities, nutritious diets, better education etc. could be taken as espousing examples to substantiate the aforementioned benefit. Moreover, this will build healthy relations between the countries, which could be taken as another merit of this noble gesture.

Despite the advantages discussed above regarding this international aid and support to the poorer nations by the developed world, there is a disadvantage as well, which could not be neglected without careful consideration. Misusing the resources could be a single most detrimental impact to be taken into account. It is commonly seen that in the absence of effective law enforcement and transparency, these financial aids could be easily misused not only by the governments but also by the politicians; therefore, the actual purpose will never be fulfilled.

In the end, indeed, the international aid by the developed countries to the poorer countries has certain benefits; however, there are some disadvantages as well which needs careful deliberation.

Stress is now a major problem in many countries around the world. What are some of the factors in modern society that cause this stress, and how can we reduce it?

It is an irrefutable fact that mental and physical stress, in this contemporary world, has become a concerning issue for the modern society globally. Considering this, this essay will outline the substantial reasons which play predominating roles in elevating the stress levels before suggesting some plausible solutions.

There is a variety of factors which attribute to increasing the stress in our society. First and foremost, balancing family and work commitments could be the main reason for a stressed lifestyle. It is generally seen that these days, the work and family responsibilities have become too demanding, which leads to not only psychological but also physiological issues resulting in increased stress. A recent article in The Age revealed that 60% of the working class agreed with the aforementioned reason, which could be taken as an espousing example to substantiate this aspect. Secondly, living a solitary life-style could be another significant reason.

Despite the reasons discussed above regarding the elevated stress levels amongst the humans, there are some solutions that can be practised to mitigate the impacts. Initially, practicing certain mindfulness activities could an effective solution to be considered. It is commonly believed that mindfulness such as meditation and yoga could help us reduce the stress levels, resulting in better management of our routines. Secondly, participating in some social and religious activities could be another solution.

In the end, indeed, it is true that there are some reasons leading to increased stress levels; however, above mentioned some solutions could be implemented to alleviate the harmful effects.