International travel and tourism makes people prejudiced rather than broad-minded. What are its causes and what measures can be taken to solve this problem?

It is an irrefutable fact that due to an urge to learn new cultures and visit new places, international tourism has increased considerably, which is, among other things, resulting in increased prejudice rather than broad mindedness. Considering this, this essay will ascertain the considerable factors which are playing their predominating role to increase the incidents of being prejudice before outlining appropriate measures to cope.

There are some factors involved in increasing the prejudice against the international tourists during their travel. Firstly, cultural and traditional sentiments could be a significant espousing factor to be considered. It is generally seen that the international tourists, inadvertently, end up hurting the cultural or traditional beliefs of not only certain communities but also some religions, which is not considered appropriate by the natives. Not removing the shoes while visiting the temples or not offering a tip to the waiters could be taken as fortifying examples. Moreover, intense bargaining by a certain community could another substantial cause for this biased behavior.

Despite the causes discussed above regarding the increased prejudice, there are quite a few readily solutions available which could be implemented to mitigate the impacts caused by the potential factors. Initially, awareness could be an effective tool. It can be defined as making ourselves familiar with the cultures and traditions of host countries before our travel by researching on the internet, so our naivety does not become a cause for the misunderstanding. Additionally, having fixed price shops, like big brands, could be another indispensable key.

In the end, indeed, prejudice with the international tourists is adversely affecting the broad-mindedness; however, aforementioned some concrete steps can assist to alleviate the damaging impacts.

The newspaper is no longer a need in the modern society. What is your opinion?

It is an irrefutable fact that newspapers, in this contemporary world, have been an integral part and parcel of our lives for a long time. Considering this, whether newspaper is relevant to this modern society or not is a matter of debate. However, this essay will ascertain both sides of the rubric before deducing a reasonable conclusion.

There is a variety of factors wherein the threat to the existence of newspapers in this tech-savvy society could be supported. Initially, the dominance of electronic media could be a substantial factor to be considered. It is generally seen that the popularity of print media has confronted a severe setback due to the advent of internet, which is more a convenient and cheaper way to access information. For example, a recent article in The Age highlighted/revealed that the use of the popular news apps has increased by 60% in the past two years. Moreover, wastage of resources, like paper and ink, which is not an eco-friendly way, may be another noteworthy factor.

Despite the factors discussed above regarding the diminishing popularity of newspapers, the importance of it in the modern society is even a crucial aspect. Affordability could be a significant factor. It is commonly believed that the newspapers have always been an indispensable part of our lives due to its cheaper prices. Additionally, preference audience for newspapers, such as older population, could be another prominent reason.

In the end, indeed, although newspapers still dominate the proportionate market, as far as I am concerned, the electronic media has made it non-existent in this modern era.

Some people believe laws change human behaviour. Do you agree with it?

Irrefutably, formation and implementation of laws are imperative for providing a congenial environment to the society. Considering this, there are certain analysts who hold the opinion that laws change the behaviour of the humans. However, I staunchly disagree with the aforementioned statement due to a notable reason.

There is a practical factor which affirms that enforcing laws does not play a great deal of role in changing human traits. Rising recidivism rate could be substantial factor. It is generally seen that even after completing the prison term for a crime or undergoing rehabilitation for certain addiction, people go back to the similar old practices. Many hard core criminals and quite a few celebrities could be taken as fortifying examples to substantiate my viewpoint.

Despite the reason discussed above, there are certain proponents who consider that adhering to laws in the society transforms the people. Fear of punishment may be single most significant factor behind opponents’ viewpoint. It may be defined as when one has to face the repercussions in the guise of penalty or imprisonment, people avoid breaking the laws. No doubt, change due to fear could be true to some extent; however, it should not be forgotten that many people have little or no regard for their social and moral responsibilities. If this is the case, would it be wise enough to generalize and say that law changes the behaviour of all the people? My answer would be no.

In the end, indeed, changing behaviour by following law transforms people to some extent, but I still believe that it is hard to change most people completely by making them adhere to laws.

Euthanasia is no longer acceptable in the modern society. Discuss the solutions to accept this fact.

It is an irrefutable fact that in this contemporary world, euthanasia has been a debatable topic for years. Considering this, this essay will ascertain the considerable/prominent factors which are playing predominating role to decrease the acceptance of euthanasia in our society before outlining the appropriate measures to cope with it.

There are some factors involved in increasing the drive against euthanasia. Firstly, being against religious and ethical beliefs could be a significant factor to be considered. It is generally believed that in every religion killing another human being, for whatever reason, is considered unethical and against the will of the Almighty.  A recent article in The Age revealed that more than 80% of the population in modern society considers euthanasia as an evil practice, which could be taken as a fortifying example. In addition to this, fear of denting the conscience and reputation of medical fraternity could be a substantial cause behind increased dislike/antipathy towards euthanasia.

Despite the causes discussed above regarding the nonacceptance of euthanasia in our society, there are quite a few readily solutions exist, which could be implemented to make it an acceptable practice. Initially, legalizing this practice could be an effective tool. It is generally seen that when a practice is legalized by the government agencies, the society, gradually, starts looking at the positives associated with such a rule, which makes them less resilient towards such beliefs. Moreover, respecting the rights and dignity of an ailing patient could be another indispensable key that can be adopted.

In the end, indeed, it is quite a complex process to accept euthanasia; however, aforementioned some concrete steps can assist to mitigate the nonacceptance of it.